View Full Version : player bound
robtheklepto
02-10-2008, 08:00 PM
stop with all the player bound garbage... that just ruins the economy more cuz everyone will have stuff they cant trade... cant sell it for pts to make some for your next items
there are to many player bound leet items...
just put lvl requirements and delete the stupid playerbound crap
only thing that needs playerbound is orbs
jeffers1986
02-11-2008, 11:57 AM
No, dont put level requirements. Unless theyre like lvl 25 or 30.
pimpa
02-11-2008, 12:23 PM
Lol what id really like to see un-player bounded is preservation orbs... its stupid making them no trade they used to go for a little less in tb than in treasury, now you have no choice but to buy from treasury... Sucks!
DChaffee777
02-11-2008, 02:02 PM
Yea... I don't see them taking away Player Binding. It makes them more if people have to buy points to replace items or gem new items because the player can't sell them. Simple economics, they let Player 1 sell his items for Player 2's points so he could buy player 3's item, only Player 2 had to buy points. Make Player 1's item Player Bound, Player 2 has to use his points to buy that item from a crew, and Player 1 has to buy points to get Player 3's item. Now multiply that by everyone wanting to buy stuff... (if you could follow it, kinda confusing) lol. That's a lot of money. Believe me, I would absolutely LOVE to sell my Eye since I got hte Angelic, but I just don't see it happening.
pimpa
02-11-2008, 02:10 PM
If you really dont want your eye to go to waste you can give me your angellic problem solved i dont mind letting my eye sit in vault :)
exdbx
02-11-2008, 04:28 PM
Yeh, following items that need to be non player bound are ; pres orbs, sacred belt, and devine ring.
it should be rga bound not account bound but everything should have lvls that way u cant just keep passing it down to multis
Sparda1234
02-11-2008, 05:39 PM
it should be rga bound not account bound but everything should have lvls that way u cant just keep passing it down to multis
agreed you would still be able to use them insted of just putting them in your vault if you get a better item for your account.
SeanyG12
02-11-2008, 05:50 PM
GAGE, that is a very good idea. they should make them like lvl reqs of about 25, which means they cant just make multi then 5mins later they can equip it would take them atleast an hour. but you should keep quest items player bound(obviously)
darkmanx88387
02-11-2008, 05:52 PM
it should be rga bound not account bound but everything should have lvls that way u cant just keep passing it down to multis
thats a really good idea i like that idea ALOT that would be wicked cool two
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.