Should Stoneraven go against the god cap?

[Domination]

Personally i think it should, it'll slow down the production of the SR items and "maybe" increase there value.

[Itai]

i agree with you domination

[darkpoey]

well each run counting as 1 cap, not like natas = 1 cap stein = another cap etc

[champ]

If it were free yes, else no. Why else would you pay 800 something points to get items ?

[SkatrBill]

dude, this is the most idiotic idea ever.... sorry to say it.... why would something that is basically a quest go against your god cap...?

[Wizzy]

Yeah, I used to think this was a good idea, but the fact that you pay 825points to do it in the first place made me change my mind. It shouldn't go against a god cap.

[littleuing]

Well if you think Stoneraven should go against your CAP, which is stupid. The space ranger would have to go against your cap to cus its basicly the same idea.

[Wizzy]

Space ranger is different. Unlike SR, Space Ranger quest is not repeatable and is "free".

[littleuing]

exactly u want to make one that you pay for go against your cap but one that you can only do once and is free not? Isnt paying to do SR good enought. if it goes againt CAP then it should be cheaper or free!

[darkpoey]

why would spaceranger go against your cap??? lol does it drop graces etc?

[Egnar]

Well if you think Stoneraven should go against your CAP, which is stupid. The space ranger would have to go against your cap to cus its basicly the same idea.
Dumbest thing I've ever heard:
1) You can only do the Space Ranger Quest once
2) Space Ranger quest doesn't drop some of the best items in the game.

[jeffers1986]

Something that costs 825 points shouldnt be capped. Stop trying to make things more expensive.

[littleuing]

Yea well if it goes toward your cap then it will hurt the smaller crews. Top crews could aford to have 5 people do SR every day in there own 5 man crew and never be caped and still take a few 5 man raids. And still be strong enought to take other strong gods. Where a smaller crew would loose there top 5 people faster and no be able to compete for other gods. So its a bad idea unless your a top crew then yea it would work better for you.

[papercut36]

It would atleast cut down on how much crews do of it.

[darkpoey]

I do agree that it is kinda dumb to cap something you pay to do, hmm, it's too late to cap SR though, it wont fix their prices, may be a good idea to cap this new thing thats comming out though

[Egnar]

Yea well if it goes toward your cap then it will hurt the smaller crews. Top crews could aford to have 5 people do SR every day in there own 5 man crew and never be caped and still take a few 5 man raids. And still be strong enought to take other strong gods. Where a smaller crew would loose there top 5 people faster and no be able to compete for other gods. So its a bad idea unless your a top crew then yea it would work better for you.
If a big crew takes its top 5 out of the crew for Stone Raven it becomes harder for them to kill the big guys.

Small crews that can do Stone Raven but hardly cap will see little difference at all.

I think that Stone Raven should go against the cap as one raid as soon as Natas is killed.

We pay for it, yes, but we have limits on it already because it's obvious that being able to do it every 2 hours is detrimental. Well, being able to do Stone Raven 14 times a week is also detrimental to our economy which is extremly important as a played economy based game. Dropping the allowed from 14 times a week to a max of 10 times a week will at the least help a little bit.

[Domination]

Stone raven raids are gods, with a quest attached to it, if these where not gods crews wouldn't be recieving anything only the account involved would.

Space ranger is a totally quest, only the account involed reaper the rewards of it not the crew.

Other gods have to be paid for too, potions/flask have to be bought, potions hunter get paid by there crew for the potions they hand in. In fact normal god raids are going to be more expensive considering the hand out give to just those pot hunters. that not to mention the raiders.